Crypto.Com witnessed a Ridiculous Governance Farce, as an Entity with 70% Voting Power Forced a 700 Billion CRO Coin Mint
Original Article Title: "Crypto.com Unfolds Absurd Governance Drama, Holding 70% Voting Power to Force 700 Billion CRO Mints"
Original Article Author: Symbol; Paper Box Ninja
Editor's Note: Several weeks ago, Crypto.com proposed a plan to reissue 700 billion burned CRO tokens. During the two-week voting period, the turnout fell short of the required threshold. If there wasn't enough participation by the deadline, the proposal would be scrapped. However, the day before the deadline, a sudden influx of 33 billion CRO token holders joined the vote, overwhelmingly pushing the proposal through. These sudden voters were none other than Crypto.com itself.
On Sunday, what seemed to be a potentially failing proposal—aimed at minting 700 billion CRO to offset the 2021 burn of an equivalent amount of tokens and reintroduce them to the market—struggled with a slim majority of affirmative votes over dissenting votes for most of the voting period (March 2 to 16) and failed to meet the required statutory quorum of 33.4%.
However, a dramatic turn of events unfolded at 14:00 UTC on Sunday, suddenly adding 33.5 billion CRO tokens to the affirmative votes, meeting the required votes for the proposal to pass by a significant margin. The final vote breakdown showed: 61.18% in favor, 17.61% against, 20.11% abstain, and 0.11% veto; with an overall turnout rate of 70.18%, far exceeding the minimum threshold of 33.4%.

The last-minute surge in votes ultimately led to the proposal's passage. Source: Mintscan
The sudden surge in votes has left many disgruntled CRO holders feeling even more aggrieved, with them viewing it as a further betrayal of trust between Crypto.com and its holders. "Very disappointed," remarked one CRO whale on Telegram, "they almost all voted at the last minute, setting a malicious precedent that could be emulated by other projects."
The crux of this controversy lies in the bulk of the votes coming from large validators operated by Crypto.com. Three independent sources indicate that these validators control between 70% to 80% of the total voting power. As of March 10, only two of its validators—Starship and Falcon Heavy—voted in favor. Despite the affirmative vote accounting for only 11.86%, far below the 77.97% opposition vote and 8.47% abstain, it did not prevent the proposal from being approved.
A representative from Crypto.com also declined to comment on this.

As of the March 10 voting results, data source: Mintscan
As the vote neared its end, three other validators controlled by Crypto.com—Electron, Antares, and Minotaur IV—also joined the yes camp; in addition, two smaller independent validators, Cosmostation and Polkachu.com, expressed their support, although their votes had little impact on the final result.

Final voting result, data source: Mintscan
With the proposal approved, the Cronos blockchain will undergo an upgrade tomorrow, during which 700 billion new tokens will be minted, while the 700 billion tokens burned in 2021 will remain out of circulation. These new tokens will be gradually released according to a five-year vesting plan and will undertake various functions, including initiating a potential CRO ETF.
However, the actions of the Crypto.com team did not stop there. On the day after the end of the vote, the team launched another proposal to burn 50 million CRO tokens (equivalent to 0.07% of the newly minted tokens) to supplement the previous three burns of the same amount. A CRO validator who voted against the re-minting proposal on Telegram indignantly wrote, "This is simply an insult to all CRO holders. How dare you propose to burn 50 million tokens on the same day you are reminting 700 billion tokens?"
The vote on this new proposal will continue for the next two weeks.
This article is a contributed piece and does not represent the views of BlockBeats.
You may also like

BIS's latest research: The future of stablecoins and the global monetary landscape

Morning News | Michael Saylor releases Bitcoin Tracker information; Aave releases post-attack investigation on Kelp rsETH bridge; Gravity Bridge announces service suspension after being attacked

Three years later: Looking back at my judgment of ChatGPT in 2023

From Casino Tools to Global Pricing Machines: The NYSE Leader's Perspective on Hyperliquid

A Detailed Analysis of "Stock God Serenity" Investment Methodology

Sharplink CEO: The future of Ethereum is unfolding

Morning Report | Korea Investment & Securities and OKX plan to jointly acquire 40% of Coinone; Polymarket denies implementing KYC comprehensively; Grayscale delays U.S. stock IPO plans

Bit Digital CEO: Why I Bought More ETH

A Decade of Three Waves of Stock Tokenization from Bitget's Reality: An Unfinished Financial Exploration

"Hu Run Baifu" Dialogue with Sun Yuchen: A New Paradigm of Value Circulation in the Web3 Transformation Cycle

Is it hackers and regulation that ruined DeFi?

Chris Lee: From crypto OG to heavy investments in the three storage giants, predictions on AI bull market corrections, Web4, and opportunities for the younger generation

Ready for a Walk on the Wilder Side of Proof of Talk 2026? Join WEEX Labs in Paris

Gold vs Bitcoin in 2026: Which Market Is Giving Traders Better Opportunities?

Morning News | Coinbase partners with Standard Chartered Bank to expand multi-currency fiat channels; Sharplink and Forward will be included in the Russell Index; JPMorgan may issue stablecoins in the future

Hash Global Founder: Why I Also Chose to Liquidate All My ETH?

Tokenized US Stock Duel: Ondo vs. xStocks, Who is Defining On-Chain Nasdaq?

